At http://www.rratedreligion.com, we’re not afraid to tackle complex theological topics. Today, we’re diving into a doctrine that, while widely popular in certain evangelical circles, often stands in stark contrast to Reformed theology: Dispensationalism. If you’ve ever heard about “the rapture,” different “ages” of God’s dealings with humanity, or a future millennium where Christ reigns on Earth with Israel, you’ve likely encountered Dispensationalism. Our goal isn’t to condemn individuals who hold these views, but to critically examine the theological framework from a Reformed perspective and see how it aligns (or doesn’t) with what we understand to be God’s singular, unfolding plan of redemption.
What Is Dispensationalism? A Brief Overview
At its core, Dispensationalism is a system of biblical interpretation that emphasizes a distinction between Israel and the Church, and posits that God works through different “dispensations” or distinct periods of time, each characterized by a specific way God tests humanity’s obedience to His will. While there are different nuances (Classic, Revised, Progressive), common tenets include:
- Literal Interpretation: A commitment to a consistently literal interpretation of Scripture, especially prophecy.
- Distinction Between Israel and the Church: The belief that Israel and the Church are two distinct peoples of God with separate destinies and covenant promises. God has a future plan for ethnic Israel that is distinct from His plan for the Church.
- Dispensations: History is divided into a series of distinct ages (typically 7 or 8), each with a unique divine administration and a specific test of humanity. Examples include Innocence, Conscience, Human Government, Promise, Law, Grace (the Church Age), and the Millennium.¹
- Pre-Tribulational Rapture: The belief that the Church will be raptured (taken up to heaven) before a seven-year period of tribulation on Earth.
- Pre-Millennialism: The belief that Christ will return before a literal 1,000-year reign on Earth (the Millennium) centered in Jerusalem, during which He will rule with a restored Israel.
This framework, largely popularized by figures like John Nelson Darby in the 19th century and later through the Scofield Reference Bible, presents a dramatic narrative of history, prophecy, and God’s interaction with humanity.
The Reformed Counterpoint: Covenant Theology’s Unified Plan
Reformed theology, on the other hand, operates from a framework known as Covenant Theology. Instead of distinct dispensations, Covenant Theology emphasizes the unity and continuity of God’s redemptive plan throughout history, revealed primarily through a series of overarching covenants. While acknowledging different administrations of these covenants, the core message remains constant: God’s salvation through Christ.
Here are the key covenants in Reformed theology:
- Covenant of Redemption (Pactum Salutis): An eternal agreement within the Trinity before creation, where the Father appoints the Son to redeem a people, the Son agrees to accomplish this, and the Holy Spirit agrees to apply the Son’s work.²
- Covenant of Works (Covenant of Life): Made with Adam in the Garden of Eden, promising life for obedience and death for disobedience. Adam’s failure plunged humanity into sin (Romans 5:12).³
- Covenant of Grace: The overarching covenant made with sinful humanity after the Fall, promising salvation through faith in Christ. This covenant is administered differently throughout history (e.g., in promises to Abraham, the Mosaic Law, the Davidic Covenant), but its substance—salvation by grace through faith—remains the same.⁴
The crucial difference lies here: Covenant Theology sees the Covenant of Grace as the one way God has always saved His people, whether before Christ’s first coming (looking forward to Him) or after (looking back at Him). There aren’t multiple ways to be saved in different dispensations; there’s one glorious plan.
Key Points of Departure: Where Reformed Theology Disagrees with Dispensationalism
Let’s explore some of the major disagreements:
1. The Relationship Between Israel and the Church
This is perhaps the most significant divergence. Dispensationalism insists on a clear distinction between ethnic Israel and the Church, with separate promises and destinies. Reformed theology, however, sees the Church as the continuation and fulfillment of true Israel.⁵
- Scriptural Basis for Unity: Paul explicitly states that in Christ, distinctions are overcome: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.” (Galatians 3:28-29 ESV).
- The Olive Tree Analogy: Romans 11 depicts believing Gentiles being “grafted into” the olive tree, which represents God’s one people. The branches that were broken off (unbelieving Israel) can be grafted back in. This strongly suggests continuity, not two separate trees.⁶
- “Israel of God”: In Galatians 6:16, Paul refers to believers (likely including both Jews and Gentiles) as “the Israel of God,” further blurring the Dispensational distinction.
For the Reformed, God has always had one people of God, revealed initially through physical Israel and now expanded to include all who believe in Christ, regardless of ethnicity. The Church is not a “parenthesis” in God’s plan, but the glorious culmination of His covenant promises.
2. The Nature of the Kingdom of God
Dispensationalism typically posits a future, literal 1,000-year earthly reign of Christ centered in Jerusalem (the Millennium), often with a re-established temple and sacrifices. Reformed theology generally holds to an Amillennial or Postmillennial view.
- Amillennialism: Believes the 1,000-year reign of Christ mentioned in Revelation 20 is symbolic, representing the entire period between Christ’s first and second comings, during which Christ reigns spiritually from heaven through His Church.⁷ The “binding of Satan” allows the gospel to go forth. There is no future literal 1,000-year earthly kingdom.
- Postmillennialism: Believes the gospel will be increasingly successful in the world, leading to a period of widespread righteousness and peace before Christ’s second coming. This “golden age” is the Millennium, and it is largely spiritual, not a literal earthly kingdom from Jerusalem.
Both Amillennialism and Postmillennialism reject the need for a future literal earthly kingdom with a rebuilt temple and sacrifices, arguing that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross has fulfilled all such Old Testament types and shadows. The temple has been replaced by Christ Himself (John 2:19-21) and by the Church (1 Corinthians 3:16).
3. The Literal Interpretation of Prophecy
While Reformed theology affirms the literal meaning of Scripture where appropriate, it also recognizes the extensive use of figurative language, symbolism, and typology in biblical prophecy. Dispensationalism’s rigorous insistence on literalism for every prophetic detail (e.g., rivers flowing from the temple, animal sacrifices in the millennium) can lead to interpretations that seem to contradict the New Testament’s emphasis on the fulfillment of Old Testament promises in Christ.⁸
- For instance, the book of Hebrews clearly teaches that the Old Covenant sacrificial system has been superseded and rendered obsolete by Christ’s perfect, once-for-all sacrifice (Hebrews 9:11-14, 10:1-18). The idea of re-instituting animal sacrifices in a future millennium, as some Dispensationalists propose, seems to undermine the sufficiency of Christ’s work.
Why Does This Matter?
Understanding these distinctions is not mere academic nitpicking. Our theological framework profoundly shapes:
- How we read the Bible: Do we see a fragmented plan or a unified narrative culminating in Christ?
- Our understanding of God’s character: Is He inconsistent in His dealings, or is His grace and faithfulness unwavering across all ages?
- Our mission: Is our primary focus on awaiting a pre-trib rapture, or on building the Kingdom of God now through evangelism, discipleship, and cultural transformation?
- Our hope: Is our ultimate hope in an earthly kingdom in Jerusalem, or in the New Heavens and New Earth where God dwells with His redeemed people (Revelation 21:1-4)?
From a Reformed perspective, God’s plan is a glorious tapestry, woven together by the crimson thread of Christ’s blood, stretching from Genesis to Revelation. There is one people of God, one way of salvation, and one everlasting Kingdom that is both inaugurated now and will be consummated at Christ’s glorious return. We stand on the shoulders of biblical theologians throughout church history who have affirmed this majestic, unified vision of God’s sovereign plan of redemption.
Let us, then, dispense with the divisions and embrace the beautiful unity of God’s covenant grace, always looking to Christ, who is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end of all things.
Footnotes
¹ For a classic articulation of Dispensationalism, see C. I. Scofield, The Scofield Reference Bible (New York: Oxford University Press, 1909), various sectional introductions and notes. For a more detailed contemporary defense, see John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck, eds., The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures by Dallas Seminary Faculty (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1983).
² Michael Horton, Covenant and Eschatology: The Divine Drama (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2002), 79-84. Also see Louis Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996), 263-267.
³ Geerhardus Vos, Biblical Theology: Old and New Testaments (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1948), 24-25.
⁴ O. Palmer Robertson, The Christ of the Covenants (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 1980), 97-104.
⁵ Herman Ridderbos, Paul: An Outline of His Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1975), 336-347.
⁶ Romans 11:17-24 (ESV).
⁷ Anthony A. Hoekema, The Bible and the Future (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1979), 164-184.
⁸ Kim Riddlebarger, A Case for Amillennialism: Understanding the End Times (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2003), 29-45.
R-Rated Religion 